Move aimed at avoiding exploitation of Indian
women for profit, but some call it discriminatory and fear potentially
dangerous consequences.
India’s government has said it would ban foreigners from using surrogate
mothers in the country, a move likely to hit the booming commercial surrogacy
industry.
Ranks of childless foreign couples have flocked to the country in recent
years looking for a cheap, legal and simple route to parenthood.
Health industry estimates put the size of India’s surrogacy business at 9bn
rupees ($138m) and growing at 20% a year.
But critics have said a lack of legislation encourages “rent-a-womb”
exploitation of young, poor Indian women. In an affidavit to the supreme court
on Wednesday the government said it “does not support commercial surrogacy”.
“No foreigners can avail
surrogacy services in India,” it told the court, which is hearing a petition regarding the industry,
adding that surrogacy would be available “only for Indian couples”.
Thousands of infertile couples,
many from overseas, hire the wombs of Indian women to carry their embryos
through to birth.
India, with cheap technology,
skilled doctors and a steady supply of local surrogates, is one of relatively
few countries where women can be paid to carry another’s child.
Surrogacy for profit is illegal in many other countries.
The process usually involves
in-vitro fertilisation and embryo transfer, leading to a rise in fertility
centres offering such services.
A top fertility expert branded
the government’s move discriminatory, while a leading women’s activist warned
it could push the industry underground and out of reach of regulators.
“Banning commercial surrogacy
will send some couples on to the black market and deprive other couples of the
chance of children,” Ranjana Kumari, director of the Centre for Social
Research, told AFP.
“Our research shows many
surrogates do not have health insurance and are paid poorly, among other
issues,” she said, adding that stronger regulation rather than an outright ban
was needed.
The private petition to the
top court seeks a halt to the importation of human embryos for commercial
purposes.
Earlier this month the court
in Delhi expressed its concern and ordered the government to spell out measures
for regulating the industry.
The government’s affidavit, presented
to the court by the solicitor general, Ranjit Kumar, said it would “require
some time to bring the law in place”.
“The government will
prohibit and penalise commercial surrogacy services,” it said.
The government has been
consulting women’s groups and the health industry on a draft bill, the Assisted
Reproductive Technology, that seeks to regulate the industry. Clinic owners
denied ill-treatment of surrogate mothers, saying it is in their interests to
treat the women well so they produce healthy babies.
Dr Nayana Patel, one of
India’s leading fertility specialists, said the move discriminated against
foreigners who were also desperate to have children.
“Yes, there need to be strict
checks and counter checks but banning foreigners is not the answer. It’s
inhuman,” Patel told AFP.
“There is no exploitation,
it’s a voluntary contract between human beings involving an exchange of money.
What’s wrong with that?”
“It’s a dignified earning.
Instead of women working as maids, they can be surrogates,” said Patel, who
runs the Akanksha fertility clinic in the western state of Gujarat.
The latest move comes after
India issued new rules in 2012 barring foreign gay couples and single people
from using surrogate mothers to become parents, drawing sharp criticism from
gay rights advocates and fertility clinics.
The existing rules say foreign
couples seeking to enter into a surrogacy arrangement in India must be a “man
and woman [who] are duly married and the marriage should be sustained at least
two years”.
The cost of surrogacy in India
generally ranges from about $18,000 to $30,000, of which around $8,000 goes to
the surrogate mother.
Current policies governing surrogacy in India ban surrogacy to non-residents who intend to start a surrogacy arrangement by entering the country as tourists. Now, foreign intended parents must apply for a specific medical VISA to India that is only granted to heterosexual couples who have been married to each other for at least 2 years. I've read that their surrogacy bill allows surrogacy to residents and non-residents as long as they meet these requirements:
ReplyDeleteYou were born Indian, are a resident in India, or a foreign citizen who is married to an Indian citizen
You are a married heterosexual couple with fertility issues
You have been married for at least 5 years
Only altruistic or unpaid surrogacy is allowed. Moreover, the surrogate must be a close family member.